Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755026AbdC3GMv (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2017 02:12:51 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:42658 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753558AbdC3GMu (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2017 02:12:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 08:12:45 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Andi Kleen Cc: Matthew Wilcox , akpm@linux-foundation.org, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso , khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,hugetlb: compute page_size_log properly Message-ID: <20170330061245.GA1972@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1488992761-9464-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net> <20170328165343.GB27446@linux-80c1.suse> <20170328165513.GC27446@linux-80c1.suse> <20170328175408.GD7838@bombadil.infradead.org> <20170329080625.GC27994@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170329174514.GB4543@tassilo.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170329174514.GB4543@tassilo.jf.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1335 Lines: 28 On Wed 29-03-17 10:45:14, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:06:25AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Tue 28-03-17 10:54:08, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 09:55:13AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > > > Do we have any consensus here? Keeping SHM_HUGE_* is currently > > > > winning 2-1. If there are in fact users out there computing the > > > > value manually, then I am ok with keeping it and properly exporting > > > > it. Michal? > > > > > > Well, let's see what it looks like to do that. I went down the rabbit > > > hole trying to understand why some of the SHM_ flags had the same value > > > as each other until I realised some of them were internal flags, some > > > were flags to shmat() and others were flags to shmget(). Hopefully I > > > disambiguated them nicely in this patch. I also added 8MB and 16GB sizes. > > > Any more architectures with a pet favourite huge/giant page size we > > > should add convenience defines for? > > > > Do we actually have any users? > > Yes this feature is widely used. Considering that none of SHM_HUGE* has been exported to the userspace headers all the users would have to use the this flag by the value and I am quite skeptical that application actually do that. Could you point me to some projects that use this? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs