Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933343AbdC3HzG (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2017 03:55:06 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f180.google.com ([209.85.128.180]:33024 "EHLO mail-wr0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932790AbdC3HzD (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2017 03:55:03 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 08:54:58 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Steven Rostedt , Jassi Brar , Lionel Debieve , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 1/1] remoteproc: Prevent schedule while atomic Message-ID: <20170330075458.l2rofpy75fhzcgwn@dell> References: <1490195923-9560-1-git-send-email-lionel.debieve@st.com> <20170322090558.72064144@vmware.local.home> <20170329160653.5fcyqiuxr7j36655@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20170329160653.5fcyqiuxr7j36655@linutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-08-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3754 Lines: 102 On Wed, 29 Mar 2017, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2017-03-22 09:05:58 [-0700], Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:18:43 +0100 > > Lionel Debieve wrote: > > > > > Use raw_spin_lock in enable/disable channel as it comes from > > > interrupt context. > > > > > > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at > > > kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:995 > > > in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 307, name: pulseaudio > > > Preemption disabled at: > > > [] __handle_domain_irq+0x4c/0xec > > > CPU: 0 PID: 307 Comm: pulseaudio > > > Hardware name: STi SoC with Flattened Device Tree > > > [] (unwind_backtrace) > > > [] (show_stack) > > > [] (dump_stack) > > > [] (___might_sleep) > > > [] (rt_spin_lock) > > > [] (sti_mbox_disable_channel) > > > [] (sti_mbox_irq_handler) > > > [] (__handle_irq_event_percpu) > > > [] (handle_irq_event_percpu) > > > [] (handle_irq_event) > > > [] (handle_fasteoi_irq) > > > [] (generic_handle_irq) > > > [] (__handle_domain_irq) > > > [] (gic_handle_irq) > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lionel Debieve > > > > Looks fine to me. Should this go to mainline? > > > > Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) > > Could this be applied upstream, please? From looking at the thread there > was no reason not to do so. Acked-by: Lee Jones > > > --- > > > drivers/mailbox/mailbox-sti.c | 12 ++++++------ > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-sti.c > > > b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-sti.c index 41bcd33..f9674ca 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-sti.c > > > +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-sti.c > > > @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ struct sti_mbox_device { > > > void __iomem *base; > > > const char *name; > > > u32 enabled[STI_MBOX_INST_MAX]; > > > - spinlock_t lock; > > > + raw_spinlock_t lock; > > > }; > > > > > > /** > > > @@ -129,10 +129,10 @@ static void sti_mbox_enable_channel(struct > > > mbox_chan *chan) unsigned long flags; > > > void __iomem *base = MBOX_BASE(mdev, instance); > > > > > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&mdev->lock, flags); > > > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&mdev->lock, flags); > > > mdev->enabled[instance] |= BIT(channel); > > > writel_relaxed(BIT(channel), base + STI_ENA_SET_OFFSET); > > > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mdev->lock, flags); > > > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mdev->lock, flags); > > > } > > > > > > static void sti_mbox_disable_channel(struct mbox_chan *chan) > > > @@ -144,10 +144,10 @@ static void sti_mbox_disable_channel(struct > > > mbox_chan *chan) unsigned long flags; > > > void __iomem *base = MBOX_BASE(mdev, instance); > > > > > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&mdev->lock, flags); > > > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&mdev->lock, flags); > > > mdev->enabled[instance] &= ~BIT(channel); > > > writel_relaxed(BIT(channel), base + STI_ENA_CLR_OFFSET); > > > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mdev->lock, flags); > > > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mdev->lock, flags); > > > } > > > > > > static void sti_mbox_clear_irq(struct mbox_chan *chan) > > > @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static int sti_mbox_probe(struct platform_device > > > *pdev) mdev->dev = &pdev->dev; > > > mdev->mbox = mbox; > > > > > > - spin_lock_init(&mdev->lock); > > > + raw_spin_lock_init(&mdev->lock); > > > > > > /* STi Mailbox does not have a Tx-Done or Tx-Ready IRQ */ > > > mbox->txdone_irq = false; > > Sebastian -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog