Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933892AbdC3Qmq (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:42:46 -0400 Received: from us01smtprelay-2.synopsys.com ([198.182.60.111]:59733 "EHLO smtprelay.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753515AbdC3Qmp (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:42:45 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [net-next] stmmac: use netif_set_real_num_{rx,tx}_queues To: Niklas Cassel , Thierry Reding , Corentin Labbe References: <20170328094856.3457886-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20170328.180105.1996071259325891752.davem@davemloft.net> <20170330074536.GA4814@Red> <20170330143435.GA28098@ulmo.ba.sec> <51947833-7559-0794-911d-d9cac65c5065@axis.com> CC: David Miller , , , , , , From: Joao Pinto Message-ID: <059fcede-1b71-a074-39c3-4993b0e0bc08@synopsys.com> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:42:38 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <51947833-7559-0794-911d-d9cac65c5065@axis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.107.19.129] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2351 Lines: 57 ?s 5:35 PM de 3/30/2017, Niklas Cassel escreveu: > On 03/30/2017 04:34 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:45:36AM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 06:01:05PM -0700, David Miller wrote: >>>> From: Arnd Bergmann >>>> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:48:21 +0200 >>>> >>>>> A driver must not access the two fields directly but should instead use >>>>> the helper functions to set the values and keep a consistent internal >>>>> state: >>>>> >>>>> ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c: In function 'stmmac_dvr_probe': >>>>> ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c:4083:8: error: 'struct net_device' has no member named 'real_num_rx_queues'; did you mean 'real_num_tx_queues'? >>>>> >>>>> Fixes: a8f5102af2a7 ("net: stmmac: TX and RX queue priority configuration") >>>>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann >>>> >>>> Applied. >>> >>> This break my revert patch. (since it patch ("net: stmmac: enable multiple buffers"). >>> Since dwmac-sunxi is still broken, what can I do ? send two revert patch ? or adapt the reverting patch. >> >> Have you tried if the kcalloc() patch I sent on Tuesday fixes things the >> issues introduced by the multiple buffers patch? Niklas reported that it >> restores functionality on his setup. >> >> If it makes things work for you as well, we could maybe avoid the revert >> altogether. > > Thierry, I know that you are using DWMAC CORE 4.XX > How many RX queues and how many TX queues have you got? > > I'm also using DWMAC CORE 4.XX > We have 2 TX queues and 1 RX queue. > > I think that Corentin is using DWMAC CORE 3.XX > > I know that Joao is using an IP Prototyping Kit that uses > DWMAC CORE 4.XX (connected via PCIe). > It would be nice if Joao could get an IP Prototyping Kit > based on DWMAC CORE 3.XX. > > Doesn't Synopsys have an IP Prototyping Kit based on > DWMAC CORE 3.XX laying around somewhere? :) > I requested a prototyping platform with MAC 100 or a MAC 1000 in order to make more tests, but I don't have an ETA for it yet. The implication of the multiple buffers patch in 3.xx is some flow change in the configuration of dma op mode or similar. I would recomend Corentin to dump the dma & mac registers in the end of the _open function in order to see if the DMA is really being well configured and is really started. Thanks. Joao