Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754871AbdCaTTl (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:19:41 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:60256 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753411AbdCaTTj (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:19:39 -0400 Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 21:19:24 +0200 From: Heiko Carstens To: Michal Hocko Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , Vlastimil Babka , Andrea Arcangeli , Reza Arbab , Yasuaki Ishimatsu , Tang Chen , qiuxishi@huawei.com, Kani Toshimitsu , slaoub@gmail.com, Joonsoo Kim , Andi Kleen , Zhang Zhen , David Rientjes , Daniel Kiper , Igor Mammedov , Vitaly Kuznetsov , LKML , Chris Metcalf , Dan Williams , Lai Jiangshan , Martin Schwidefsky , Michal Hocko , Gerald Schaefer Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] mm: make movable onlining suck less References: <20170330115454.32154-1-mhocko@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170330115454.32154-1-mhocko@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 17033119-0008-0000-0000-00000416E381 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 17033119-0009-0000-0000-00001D115283 Message-Id: <20170331191924.GB3021@osiris> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-03-31_16:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1702020001 definitions=main-1703310177 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 549 Lines: 13 On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 01:54:48PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > Patch 5 is the core of the change. In order to make it easier to review > I have tried it to be as minimalistic as possible and the large code > removal is moved to patch 6. > > I would appreciate if s390 folks could take a look at patch 4 and the > arch_add_memory because I am not sure I've grokked what they wanted to > achieve there completely. [adding Gerald Schaefer] This seems to work fine on s390. So for the s390 bits: Acked-by: Heiko Carstens