Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261797AbTE2BCY (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2003 21:02:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261798AbTE2BCY (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2003 21:02:24 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:53636 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261797AbTE2BCX (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2003 21:02:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 18:14:26 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: Dave Jones , Roman Zippel , John Stoffel , DevilKin-LKML , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.70 compile error Message-ID: <20030529011426.GW8978@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , "Martin J. Bligh" , Dave Jones , Roman Zippel , John Stoffel , DevilKin-LKML , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200305271729.49047.devilkin-lkml@blindguardian.org> <20030527153619.GJ8978@holomorphy.com> <16083.35048.737099.575241@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20030527184016.GA5847@suse.de> <4060000.1054072761@[10.10.2.4]> <20030528033459.GR8978@holomorphy.com> <13590000.1054102279@[10.10.2.4]> <20030528074317.GE19818@holomorphy.com> <15740000.1054135688@[10.10.2.4]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15740000.1054135688@[10.10.2.4]> Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1130 Lines: 26 At some point in the past, my attribution was stripped from: >> (1) APIC vs. xAPIC >> (2) clustered hierarchical DFR vs. flat DFR >> (3) physical DESTMOD vs. logical DESTMOD in IO-APIC RTE's >> (4) wakeup via INIT or via NMI >> (5) physical IPI's or logical IPI's >> So one could easily form destinations by: On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 08:28:09AM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > Yes. It's fixable, and I think that's a good project for 2.7, but I really > don't think that level of change is justified at the moment. Testing this > stuff is a pain in the ass, it's a lot of work to do properly and carefully. > And what does that change buy us in reality? Not a lot. > I agree it would be nice to do ... just not the focus during a 2.6 > stabilisation effort, when we have so many other more important things to > work on, that would have real impact. Yes, it's 2.7 material. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/