Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752013AbdDCJjM (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2017 05:39:12 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f66.google.com ([209.85.215.66]:33108 "EHLO mail-lf0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751571AbdDCJjK (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2017 05:39:10 -0400 From: =?UTF-8?q?Micha=C5=82=20K=C4=99pie=C5=84?= To: Jonathan Woithe , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/3] fujitsu-laptop: call_fext_func() cleanup Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 11:38:56 +0200 Message-Id: <20170403093859.6685-1-kernel@kempniu.pl> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.12.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 709 Lines: 16 This series contains a few cleanups for the call_fext_func() function. It does not depend on the previous series I submitted for fujitsu-laptop, which is why I am sending it in parallel with the backlight cleanup series. While patches 1 and 2 are tangible improvements, I will understand if you deem patch 3 to be unnecessary churn. I decided to submit it anyway as I think it might bring some benefit to a casual reader of the module's code, but it is basically just a suggestion and as it is the last patch, it can simply be omitted when the series is applied. drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c | 39 +++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) -- 2.12.1