Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752234AbdDCT6N (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 3 Apr 2017 15:58:13 -0400
Received: from tartarus.angband.pl ([89.206.35.136]:37522 "EHLO
        tartarus.angband.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751590AbdDCT6M (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 3 Apr 2017 15:58:12 -0400
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 21:57:56 +0200
From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>,
        "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] minitty: a minimal TTY layer alternative for
 embedded systems
Message-ID: <20170403195756.xitzpei2knmwt3sx@angband.pl>
References: <20170401222119.25106-1-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
 <87pogur0y9.fsf@firstfloor.org>
 <alpine.LFD.2.20.1704021729470.1847@knanqh.ubzr>
 <CAHp75VdgEcyXPxENS87nHLtCEHqB5Z-1_T_W1opSiKqqNpeU2A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170403153103.GB22592@two.firstfloor.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20170403153103.GB22592@two.firstfloor.org>
X-Junkbait: aaron@angband.pl, zzyx@angband.pl
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kilobyte@angband.pl
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on tartarus.angband.pl); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 603
Lines: 15

On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 08:31:03AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Except for that (and possibly VT) it is unlikely that people really
> rely on the obsolete terminal features from the 70ies. So it's a kind
> of cleanup.

But... but... but what shall we do without OLCUC?!?

I guess sending these features to the pasture would be nice even in
mainstream TTY.  Probably even without a Kconfig option to restore them.

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Meow!
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Collisions shmolisions, let's see them find a collision or second
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ preimage for double rot13!