Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752205AbdDCUJm (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2017 16:09:42 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f51.google.com ([209.85.214.51]:38309 "EHLO mail-it0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751736AbdDCUJk (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2017 16:09:40 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 16:09:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Adam Borowski cc: Andi Kleen , Andy Shevchenko , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arm Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] minitty: a minimal TTY layer alternative for embedded systems In-Reply-To: <20170403195756.xitzpei2knmwt3sx@angband.pl> Message-ID: References: <20170401222119.25106-1-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> <87pogur0y9.fsf@firstfloor.org> <20170403153103.GB22592@two.firstfloor.org> <20170403195756.xitzpei2knmwt3sx@angband.pl> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LFD 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 669 Lines: 22 On Mon, 3 Apr 2017, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 08:31:03AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Except for that (and possibly VT) it is unlikely that people really > > rely on the obsolete terminal features from the 70ies. So it's a kind > > of cleanup. > > But... but... but what shall we do without OLCUC?!? > > I guess sending these features to the pasture would be nice even in > mainstream TTY. Probably even without a Kconfig option to restore them. Thing is... those arcane features don't take much code at all: if (O_OLCUC(tty)) c = toupper(c); That's it. I didn't make the minitty code 5x smaller just by omitting those. ;-) Nicolas