Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752076AbdDCXos (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2017 19:44:48 -0400 Received: from server.atrad.com.au ([150.101.241.2]:33564 "EHLO server.atrad.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751734AbdDCXor (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2017 19:44:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 09:13:50 +0930 From: Jonathan Woithe To: Darren Hart Cc: Micha?? K??pie?? , Andy Shevchenko , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fujitsu-laptop: call_fext_func() cleanup Message-ID: <20170403234350.GA14026@marvin.atrad.com.au> References: <20170403093859.6685-1-kernel@kempniu.pl> <20170403221311.GA17322@fury> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170403221311.GA17322@fury> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-MIMEDefang-action: accept Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1767 Lines: 38 On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 03:13:11PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 11:38:56AM +0200, Micha?? K??pie?? wrote: > > This series contains a few cleanups for the call_fext_func() function. > > It does not depend on the previous series I submitted for > > fujitsu-laptop, which is why I am sending it in parallel with the > > backlight cleanup series. > > > > While patches 1 and 2 are tangible improvements, I will understand if > > you deem patch 3 to be unnecessary churn. I decided to submit it anyway > > as I think it might bring some benefit to a casual reader of the > > module's code, but it is basically just a suggestion and as it is the > > last patch, it can simply be omitted when the series is applied. > > > > drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c | 39 +++++++++++------------------------ > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > These all look like worthwhile changes to me. Jonathan, are you aware of > any usage of the arguments in 3/3 that would argue against changing their > names to the more specific ones? Certainly not at this stage and realistically I don't expect this to change. The suggested renaming of fields does add a degree of clarity to the code so I have no problem with it. > Pushed to the temporary fujitsu branch for testing, awaiting ack from > Jonathan. Even though these are small changes I agree that all three patches contain worthwhile improvements. I'm happy for all three of them to be merged. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Woithe FYI I am still working through the more extensive backlight cleanup series. This is a particularly busy week for me so my review comments might only come through towards the end of the week or during the weekend. Regards jonathan