Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754079AbdDDNtE (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Apr 2017 09:49:04 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f181.google.com ([209.85.220.181]:35698 "EHLO mail-qk0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753943AbdDDNtA (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Apr 2017 09:49:00 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4d324041eea35fc04aca56b60c36035724cff2ba.1491264643.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> References: <4d324041eea35fc04aca56b60c36035724cff2ba.1491264643.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 16:48:59 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] watchdog: iTCO_wdt: Add PMC specific noreboot update api To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Zha Qipeng , "dvhart@infradead.org" , Guenter Roeck , Wim Van Sebroeck , Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan , David Box , Rajneesh Bhardwaj , Platform Driver , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1210 Lines: 29 On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:24 AM, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote: > In some SoCs, setting noreboot bit needs modification to > PMC GC registers. But not all PMC drivers allow other drivers > to memory map their GC region. This could create mem request > conflict in watchdog driver. So this patch adds facility to allow > PMC drivers to pass noreboot update function to watchdog > drivers via platform data. > /* Set the NO_REBOOT bit: this disables reboots */ > if (p->iTCO_version >= 2) { > - val32 = readl(p->gcs_pmc); > - val32 |= no_reboot_bit(p); > - writel(val32, p->gcs_pmc); > + if (p->update_noreboot_flag) > + p->update_noreboot_flag(true); > + else { > + val32 = readl(p->gcs_pmc); > + val32 |= no_reboot_bit(p); > + writel(val32, p->gcs_pmc); > + } What I meant is to introduce helper(s) first and then fix this. Yes, I understand it might increase work for backporting (if even needed), but I still think it worth doing. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko