Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754800AbdDDPot (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Apr 2017 11:44:49 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:40357 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754292AbdDDPos (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Apr 2017 11:44:48 -0400 Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 08:44:45 -0700 From: Darren Hart To: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBLxJlwaWXFhA==?= Cc: Jonathan Woithe , Andy Shevchenko , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 04+/11] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: simplify set_lcd_level() Message-ID: <20170404154445.GB5936@fury> References: <20170404000102.GD17322@fury> <20170404093903.15675-1-kernel@kempniu.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20170404093903.15675-1-kernel@kempniu.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1196 Lines: 30 On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 11:39:03AM +0200, Michał Kępień wrote: > acpi_execute_simple_method() takes a method parameter which tells it to > look for the given method underneath the given handle, so calling > acpi_get_handle() beforehand is redundant. Replace the call to > acpi_get_handle() with a call to acpi_execute_simple_method(), thus > eliminating the need for a local variable storing the handle. Update > debug message to reflect this change. Also do not assign a default > value to status as it has no influence on execution flow. > > Signed-off-by: Michał Kępień > --- > Darren, > > This is patch 04/11 with updated debug and commit messages. Now that > you mentioned this issue, I think we should do the same for patch 2/3 in > the call_fext_func() cleanup series [1]. Would you like me to just send > an updated version of that specific patch (similarly to what I did in > this case) or rather send v2 of the entire call_fext_func() cleanup > series? Thanks, looks good. Now that there is more than one cleanup, please do just send a v2 of the entire series. Less error prone that way. Thanks, -- Darren Hart VMware Open Source Technology Center