Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754818AbdDDQ1n (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Apr 2017 12:27:43 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:16299 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752518AbdDDQ1m (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Apr 2017 12:27:42 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,275,1486454400"; d="scan'208";a="69086411" Message-ID: <1491323258.708.140.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] auxdisplay: Move panel.c to drivers/auxdisplay folder From: Andy Shevchenko To: Willy TARREAU Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Miguel Ojeda Sandonis , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linus Walleij Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:27:38 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20170330125442.GE793@haproxy.com> References: <20170324140635.56565-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <1490365775.21738.7.camel@linux.intel.com> <20170327081111.GA28802@haproxy.com> <20170327090153.GC28802@haproxy.com> <1490873226.708.68.camel@linux.intel.com> <20170330125442.GE793@haproxy.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1723 Lines: 45 On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 14:54 +0200, Willy TARREAU wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 02:27:06PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-03-27 at 11:01 +0200, Willy TARREAU wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:26:07AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven > > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Willy TARREAU > > > y.co > > > > m> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 04:19:43PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Andy Shevchenko > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 15:19 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Andy Shevchenko > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > In fact here the output signals should be seen as a shared bus > > > with > > > multiple > > > chip select signals. Note that in some designs it's even possible > > > that > > > pressing > > > multiple buttons will cause crap to be sent to the LCD by short- > > > circuiting > > > the lines (if no diodes are used) but it might be acceptable for > > > many > > > designs, > > > especially the DIY field where the principle is "don't do it". > > > > So, summarizing the comments are we okay to proceed or there is a > > clear > > objection? > > I don't know all the impacts, but as long as it continues to work I'm > totally fine with seeing the code being changed and refactored. It > already got a nice improvement with this series. Furthermore I can > occasionally give it a try if that helps :-) It will. I'm about to send v2 with tags applied so far. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy