Message-ID: <3ED65593.1080401@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 14:46:43 -0400
From: David van Hoose <davidvh@cox.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Downing, Thomas" <Thomas.Downing@ipc.com>
CC: Thomas Molina <tmolina@cox.net>, Florin Iucha <florin@iucha.net>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is ALSA broken in 2.5.70?
References: <170EBA504C3AD511A3FE00508BB89A920221E5F9@exnanycmbx4.ipc.com>
In-Reply-To: <170EBA504C3AD511A3FE00508BB89A920221E5F9@exnanycmbx4.ipc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

Downing, Thomas wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David van Hoose [mailto:davidvh@cox.net]
> [snip]
> 
>>2.4.21-rc5. ALSA on 2.5.70-bk2 reported to be 0.9.2, but everyone says
>>it is 0.9.3c.
> 
> [snip]
> 
> Might the problem be incompatible versions of the alsa utilities and
> libs you are using with the alsa modules in the kernel?  I don't know,
> just a suggestion.  Feel free to flam...

I'm using alsa-lib 0.9.3, alsa-utils 0.9.3, alsa-tools 0.9.3 ALSA's OSS 
compatibility library 0.9.1.
For 2.4.21-rc5, I'm using 0.9.2 since 0.9.3 does not give me sound.
For 2.5.70-bk3, I'm using whatever is in it. I believe it is a version 
of 0.9.2, but I am not entirely sure.

Thanks,
David

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/