Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262489AbTE2Scl (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2003 14:32:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262490AbTE2Scl (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2003 14:32:41 -0400 Received: from 213-4-13-153.uc.nombres.ttd.es ([213.4.13.153]:8454 "EHLO small.felipe-alfaro.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262489AbTE2Scl (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2003 14:32:41 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.5.70-mm2 From: Felipe Alfaro Solana To: LKML In-Reply-To: <20030529103628.54d1e4a0.akpm@digeo.com> References: <170EBA504C3AD511A3FE00508BB89A920221E5FF@exnanycmbx4.ipc.com> <20030529103628.54d1e4a0.akpm@digeo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1054233955.690.1.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.3.92 (Preview Release) Date: 29 May 2003 20:45:56 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 19:36, Andrew Morton wrote: > Some of these use fsync()-based synchronisation and won't benefit, but they > may have compile-time or runtime options to use O_SYNC instead. > > > Apart from that, just using the kernel in day-to-day activity is the most > important thing. If everyone does that, and everyone is happy then by > definition this kernel is a wrap. I'm already happy with 2.5.70 :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/