Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755289AbdDEBXw (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Apr 2017 21:23:52 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43968 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755061AbdDEBXt (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Apr 2017 21:23:49 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 9549F67EB4 Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dyoung@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 9549F67EB4 Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 09:23:41 +0800 From: Dave Young To: Matt Fleming Cc: Omar Sandoval , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kexec regression since 4.9 caused by efi Message-ID: <20170405012341.GA3465@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> References: <20170308201616.GC8598@vader> <20170309063806.GB17257@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <20170309095408.GA17883@vader> <20170313073748.GA6332@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <20170316124132.GF6261@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20170317020951.GA3942@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <20170317133232.GI6261@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20170320021412.GA3793@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <20170404133719.GE19827@codeblueprint.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170404133719.GE19827@codeblueprint.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Wed, 05 Apr 2017 01:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 463 Lines: 14 On 04/04/17 at 02:37pm, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Mon, 20 Mar, at 10:14:12AM, Dave Young wrote: > > > > Matt, I'm fine if you prefer to capture the range checking errors. > > Would you like me to post it or just you send it out? > > Can you please send out the patch with the minimal change to > efi_arch_mem_reserve() and we'll get it into urgent ASAP. Omar has sent it out, for the lookup function issue I think I can do it after this one later. Thanks Dave