Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932789AbdDEJn7 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Apr 2017 05:43:59 -0400 Received: from mx08-00178001.pphosted.com ([91.207.212.93]:60177 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932194AbdDEJno (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Apr 2017 05:43:44 -0400 From: Hugues FRUCHET To: Joe Perches , Andy Whitcroft CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] checkpatch: test missing initial blank line in block comment Thread-Topic: [PATCH v1] checkpatch: test missing initial blank line in block comment Thread-Index: AQHSrK1seI0c+MrB6EOR0d8E/iXMYKG2UPMAgAADYwCAABL6gA== Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 09:43:38 +0000 Message-ID: <6755c558-baeb-307d-5a3e-f58650457cd3@st.com> References: <1491206895-24332-1-git-send-email-hugues.fruchet@st.com> <1491206895-24332-2-git-send-email-hugues.fruchet@st.com> <1491246400.27353.59.camel@perches.com> <5518d438-7c73-2ba0-de77-0650742895e6@st.com> <1491381342.27353.76.camel@perches.com> In-Reply-To: <1491381342.27353.76.camel@perches.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.75.127.47] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-04-05_08:,, signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1937 Lines: 58 On 04/05/2017 10:35 AM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 08:23 +0000, Hugues FRUCHET wrote: >> Hi Joe, thanks for reviewing, > > Hello Hugues > >> I have run the command you advice on the entire kernel code, modifying >> the script to only match the newly introduced check case. >> There was 14389 hits, quite huge, so I cannot 100% certify that there >> are no false positives, but I have checked the output carefully and >> found 2 limit cases: >> >> 1) space character placed just after "/*" >> WARNING: Block comments starts with an empty /* >> #330: FILE: arch/alpha/kernel/core_irongate.c:330: >> + /* >> + * Check for within the AGP aperture... >> => 146 hits (grep -c -n -E "\/\* $" /tmp/check.txt) >> >> 2) // style comment followed by pointer dereference >> WARNING: Block comments starts with an empty /* >> #426: FILE: drivers/media/dvb-core/dvb_ca_en50221.c:426: >> + // success >> + *tupleType = _tupleType; >> => 4 hits >> >> Anyway this reveal comment style related issues, so I would say that we >> can keep script as it is, what do you think about ? > > Glancing at the output, there is also the comment > in a multiline macro case: > > WARNING: Block comments starts with an empty /* > #354: FILE: arch/mips/include/asm/processor.h:354: > + /* \ > + * Other stuff associated with the process \ > > Dunno how common that is, but maybe the test > should be changed to avoid those. > Here is a proposal that remove this macro case: # Missing initial /* if ($realfile !~ m@^(drivers/net/|net/)@ && #networking exception $prevrawline =~ /^\+[ \t]\/\**.+[ \t]/ && #start with /*... $prevrawline !~ /^\+.*\/\*.*\*\/[ \t]*/ && #no inline /*...*/ + $prevrawline !~ /^\+[ \t]\/\*+[ \t]+\\$/ &&#no macro /*<\> $rawline =~ /^\+[ \t]*\*/ && $realline > 2) { WARN("MISSING_INITIAL_BLOCK_COMMENT_STYLE", "Block comments starts with an empty /*\n" . $hereprev); } BR, Hugues.