Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262872AbTE2U7c (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2003 16:59:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262903AbTE2U7M (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2003 16:59:12 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:25614 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262872AbTE2U57 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2003 16:57:59 -0400 To: Mark Peloquin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@redhat.com Subject: Re: Nightly regression runs against current bk tree References: <3ED66C83.8070608@austin.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> From: Andi Kleen Date: 29 May 2003 23:11:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <3ED66C83.8070608@austin.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> Message-ID: Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mark Peloquin writes: > We have dedicated a machine and thrown together some scripts that will grab > and build the latest kernel files, execute the regression suite, > collecting (hopefully) > enough system state information to allow meaningful analysis of any peculiar > results encountered. How about doing a LTP run too with some difference file for new FAILs/BROKs ? That's not strictly a benchmark, but would help catching regressions quickly. I notice your benchmark mix is very IO heavy, it would be nice to test other aspects of the system too. Perhaps lmbench and reaim compute workload? It would be nice if we had a new linux-testresults list where such updates could be posted regularly. I don't think it belong on l-k because it would be too noisy. Perhaps such a list could be added to vger. David, what do you think? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/