Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S132036AbQKBA7m>; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 19:59:42 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S132049AbQKBA7c>; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 19:59:32 -0500
Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com ([207.175.42.156]:64008 "EHLO
	devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S132036AbQKBA7O>; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 19:59:14 -0500
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 19:59:14 -0500
From: Bill Nottingham <notting@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?
Message-ID: <20001101195914.A27433@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Bill Nottingham <notting@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20001101234058.B1598@werewolf.able.es> <200011012345.PAA20284@pizda.ninka.net> <20001101172100.A5081@fsmlabs.com> <200011020011.QAA20585@pizda.ninka.net> <8tqcng$d8p$1@cesium.transmeta.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <8tqcng$d8p$1@cesium.transmeta.com>; from hpa@zytor.com on Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 04:32:48PM -0800
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com) said: 
> I think at least supporting a "kgcc" compiler makes sense,
> conceptually (although it probably should have been called "kcc", but
> it's too late now.)

There was already some userland package named kcc, with a kcc
binary. A Kanji converter of some sort, IIRC.

Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/