Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263496AbTE3Jqj (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2003 05:46:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263528AbTE3Jqj (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2003 05:46:39 -0400 Received: from [62.29.76.200] ([62.29.76.200]:17541 "EHLO submoron.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263496AbTE3Jqi (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2003 05:46:38 -0400 From: "ismail (cartman) donmez" Organization: Bogazici University To: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Recent binutils releases and linux kernel 2.5.69+ Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 12:59:10 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 Cc: "H. J. Lu" , linux kernel , GNU C Library References: <20030529074448.A29931@lucon.org> <200305301245.26808.kde@myrealbox.com> <20030530094805.GA30793@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20030530094805.GA30793@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=20charset=3D=22=FDso-885?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?9-9=22?= Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200305301259.10457.kde@myrealbox.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 30 May 2003 12:48, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > How so? If the sysctl values change you're screwed anyway. Heh that was what I mean like what if glibc header and kernel header differs a lot. Its bringing more harm than goodness but including linux/sysctl.h in sys/sysctl.h makes two header synchronised. Wondering what glibc guys think to solve this ? Ulrich Drepper or some other glibc hacker make a comment please? Regards, /ismail - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/