Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:04:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:04:47 -0500 Received: from emcmail.lss.emc.com ([168.159.48.78]:22703 "EHLO emc.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:04:36 -0500 Message-ID: <3A9D3C9E.6090807@emc.com> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:59:58 -0500 From: Ric Wheeler Reply-To: ric@emc.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.10 i686; en-US; m18) Gecko/20010131 Netscape6/6.01 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David L. Nicol" CC: Zack Brown , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-cluster@nl.linux.org Subject: Re: Will Mosix go into the standard kernel? In-Reply-To: <3A9C1A3A.8BC1BCF2@kasey.umkc.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org There are two parts of MOSIX that deal with file systems. In MOSIX, every migrated process leaves a proxy at its creation (home) node that services all system call requests, including IO calls. What newer versions of MOSIX did is to add the "DFSA" (direct file system access) layer that allows MOSIX to support executing file system calls locally for migrated process when they are against a cache coherent, cluster file system (think GFS). When this was put in MOSIX, they also did a write through, non-caching file system to test their DFSA code called MFS. Both the MOSIX team and the global file system group have been involved in getting their stuff to play nicely together. ric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/