Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932886AbdDGB6N (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Apr 2017 21:58:13 -0400 Received: from LGEAMRELO12.lge.com ([156.147.23.52]:55421 "EHLO lgeamrelo12.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753763AbdDGB6J (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Apr 2017 21:58:09 -0400 X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.126 X-Original-MAILFROM: iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com X-Original-SENDERIP: 165.244.249.23 X-Original-MAILFROM: iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.222.138 X-Original-MAILFROM: iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:00:19 +0900 From: Joonsoo Kim To: Minchan Kim CC: Andrew Morton , Sergey Senozhatsky , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] zram: implement deduplication in zram Message-ID: <20170407020019.GB17231@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> References: <1490852289-11913-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> <20170330152502.c0fd67c4df30db552abce000@linux-foundation.org> <20170330234056.GB5807@bbox> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170330234056.GB5807@bbox> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on LGEKRMHUB06/LGE/LG Group(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 2017/04/07 10:57:32, Serialize by Router on LGEKRMHUB06/LGE/LG Group(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 2017/04/07 10:57:32, Serialize complete at 2017/04/07 10:57:32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 963 Lines: 27 On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 08:40:56AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > Hi Andrew and Joonsoo, > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 03:25:02PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:38:05 +0900 js1304@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > This patchset implements deduplication feature in zram. Motivation > > > is to save memory usage by zram. There are detailed description > > > about motivation and experimental results on patch #2 so please > > > refer it. > > > > I'm getting a lot of rejects against the current -mm tree. So this is > > one of those patchsets which should be prepared against -mm, please. > > Due to my partial IO refactoring. Sorry for the inconvenience. > It's still on-going and I want to merge it before new feature like > dedup. > > Joonsoo, > > I will send partial-IO rework formal patch next week and start to > review your patchset so I hope you resend your patchset based on it > with my comments. No problem. I will wait. :) Thanks.