Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 10:15:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
        Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>,
        dann frazier <dann.frazier@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/18] clocksource/arch_timer: Errata workaround
 infrastructure rework
In-Reply-To: <e89c2826-85e1-74f4-de73-e4c18b2e7ec9@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1704071010020.1716@nanos>
References: <20170404171826.25030-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <20170406162714.GC7705@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <e89c2826-85e1-74f4-de73-e4c18b2e7ec9@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 757
Lines: 17

On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 06/04/2017 18:27, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > Are you happy to take the arch_timer patches above? If yes, Marc can
> > create a common branch with the first 5 patches which I will merge in
> > the arm64 tree. You can then pull the whole series into your tree.
> 
> Hi Catalin,
> 
> I'm fine with the merge process you are proposing. But before going
> forward, I would like to wait a bit in order to give the opportunity to
> Thomas to review the patchset.

I'm fine with that. It's sad that we need to have a workaround framework
for dealing with this, but silicon tinkerers seem to compete on providing
the most broken implementation of an _architected_ timer.

Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>