Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932101AbdDGKWW (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Apr 2017 06:22:22 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.10]:35308 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753754AbdDGKWN (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Apr 2017 06:22:13 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 50,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:967:973:982:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1540:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2198:2199:2393:2525:2560:2563:2682:2685:2828:2859:2933:2937:2939:2942:2945:2947:2951:2954:3022:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3874:3934:3936:3938:3941:3944:3947:3950:3953:3956:3959:4250:4321:4362:4423:5007:7903:9025:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12043:12555:12740:12760:12895:12986:13069:13071:13161:13229:13311:13357:13439:14180:14181:14659:14721:21060:21080:30054:30070:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:2,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: bite15_4d1a18e63f656 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2171 Message-ID: <1491560528.3250.20.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] checkpatch: test missing initial blank line in block comment From: Joe Perches To: Hugues FRUCHET , Andy Whitcroft Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linus Torvalds Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 03:22:08 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <1491206895-24332-1-git-send-email-hugues.fruchet@st.com> <1491206895-24332-2-git-send-email-hugues.fruchet@st.com> <1491246400.27353.59.camel@perches.com> <5518d438-7c73-2ba0-de77-0650742895e6@st.com> <1491381342.27353.76.camel@perches.com> <6755c558-baeb-307d-5a3e-f58650457cd3@st.com> <1491386103.27353.78.camel@perches.com> <654b3487-23a1-4766-4f42-73fa41fd7c9a@st.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.3-0ubuntu0.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 872 Lines: 42 On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 09:56 +0000, Hugues FRUCHET wrote: > Hi Joe, Hi again Hugues. > here is the output with the last version of the script: > https://paste.ubuntu.com/24333124/ > > Differences are on the macro cases and the //foo \ *bar, no more warned. Thanks. I guess my only real concern about this test is there are ~15000 instances of this in the tree. Do maintainers care if comments are formatted /* * [multiple...] * line comment */ vs /* [multiple...] * line comment */ enough to want others to submit patches changing from the latter style? The reason the networking checking exists is because David Miller, the primary networking maintainer, was constantly telling others to resubmit patches to his preferred style. I doubt there's another maintainer that cares that much one way or another. I don't. Any opinions from anyone else?