Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1756543AbdDGPbM (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:31:12 -0400
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:60131 "EHLO
        bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1756469AbdDGPbE (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:31:04 -0400
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 17:30:55 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@android.com>, Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>,
        Andres Oportus <andresoportus@google.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ensure max frequency while
 running RT/DL tasks
Message-ID: <20170407153055.nd3qlyfrc3eywl5s@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1488469507-32463-1-git-send-email-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
 <1488469507-32463-4-git-send-email-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1488469507-32463-4-git-send-email-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 173
Lines: 4

On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 03:45:04PM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> +	struct task_struct *curr = cpu_curr(smp_processor_id());

Isn't that a weird way of writing 'current' ?