Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264012AbTE3UQz (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2003 16:16:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264047AbTE3UQz (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2003 16:16:55 -0400 Received: from pao-ex01.pao.digeo.com ([12.47.58.20]:47576 "EHLO pao-ex01.pao.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264012AbTE3UQy (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2003 16:16:54 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 13:30:15 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "John Stoffel" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: 2.5.70-mm2 Message-Id: <20030530133015.4f305808.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <16087.47491.603116.892709@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <20030529012914.2c315dad.akpm@digeo.com> <20030529042333.3dd62255.akpm@digeo.com> <16087.47491.603116.892709@gargle.gargle.HOWL> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.0pre1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 May 2003 20:30:14.0356 (UTC) FILETIME=[4680E140:01C326EA] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "John Stoffel" wrote: > > >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Morton writes: > > >> . A couple more locking mistakes in ext3 have been fixed. > > Andrew> But not all of them. The below is needed on SMP. > > Any hint on when -mm3 will be out, About ten hours hence, probably. > and if it will include the RAID1 patches? I have a raid0 patch from Neil, but no raid1 patch. I saw one drift past, from Zwane (I think), but wasn't sure that it worked. If someone has a raid1 fix, please send it. > I haven't had time to play with -mm2, and all the stuff > floating by about problems has made me a bit hesitant to try it out. Welll ext3 has been a bit bumpy of course. It's getting better, but I haven't yet been able to give it a 12-hour bash on the 4-way. Last time I tried a circuit breaker conked; it lasted three hours but even ext3 needs electricity. But three hours is very positive - it was hard testing. I'm not testing RAID at present, partly because I'm too stoopid to understand mdadm and partly because the box-with-18-disks heats the room up too much. This needs to change, because of possible interaction between the IO scheduler work and software RAID. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/