Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752650AbdDITOt (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Apr 2017 15:14:49 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:38850 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752400AbdDITOp (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Apr 2017 15:14:45 -0400 Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 21:14:18 +0200 From: Greg KH To: "Mkrtchyan, Tigran" , Anna Schumaker Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: patch to candidate for stable kernel 4.10 Message-ID: <20170409191418.GA28432@kroah.com> References: <1547554993.8776939.1491730590167.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1547554993.8776939.1491730590167.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 430 Lines: 19 On Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 11:36:30AM +0200, Mkrtchyan, Tigran wrote: > > Dear stable kernel maintainers, > > Please consider commit > > f17f8a14e82cdf34cd6473e3644f3c672b3884f6 > > to be included into 4.10 kernel. As long as it crashes > kernels used by some distors, we have to disable corresponding > functionality on the NFS servers. So just for 4.10? Nothing older? What does the NFS maintainer say? thanks, greg k-h