Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751275AbdDJEJ0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:09:26 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:41640 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750711AbdDJEJX (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:09:23 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 9A3DB6089A Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=rnayak@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] PM / Domains: Add support for explicit control of PM domains To: Jon Hunter , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Kevin Hilman , Ulf Hansson , geert@linux-m68k.org References: <1490710443-27425-1-git-send-email-jonathanh@nvidia.com> <1490710443-27425-3-git-send-email-jonathanh@nvidia.com> Cc: stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org, Marek Szyprowski , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org From: Rajendra Nayak Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:39:15 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1490710443-27425-3-git-send-email-jonathanh@nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 6886 Lines: 231 Hey Jon, On 03/28/2017 07:44 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > The current generic PM domain framework (GenDP) only allows a single > PM domain to be associated with a given device. There are several > use-cases for various system-on-chip devices where it is necessary for > a PM domain consumer to control more than one PM domain where the PM > domains: > i). Do not conform to a parent-child relationship so are not nested > ii). May not be powered on and off at the same time so need independent > control. > > To support the above, add new APIs for GenPD to allow consumers to get, > power-on, power-off and put PM domains so that they can be explicitly > controlled by the consumer. thanks for working on this RFC. [].. > +/** > + * pm_genpd_get - Get a generic I/O PM domain by name > + * @name: Name of the PM domain. > + * > + * Look-ups a PM domain by name. If found, increment the device > + * count for PM domain to ensure that the PM domain cannot be > + * removed, increment the suspended count so that it can still > + * be turned off (when not in-use) and return a pointer to its > + * generic_pm_domain structure. If not found return ERR_PTR(). > + */ > +struct generic_pm_domain *pm_genpd_get(const char *name) > +{ > + struct generic_pm_domain *gpd, *genpd = ERR_PTR(-EEXIST); > + > + if (!name) > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > + > + mutex_lock(&gpd_list_lock); > + list_for_each_entry(gpd, &gpd_list, gpd_list_node) { > + if (!strcmp(gpd->name, name)) { > + genpd_lock(gpd); > + gpd->device_count++; There apis' should also take a device pointer as a parameter, so we can track all the devices belonging to a powerdomain. That would also mean keeping the genpd->dev_list updated instead of only incrementing the device_count here. > + gpd->suspended_count++; > + genpd_unlock(gpd); > + genpd = gpd; > + break; > + } > + } > + mutex_unlock(&gpd_list_lock); > + > + return genpd; Instead of returning a pointer to generic_pm_domain to all consumers (who are then free to poke around it) we should hide all internal structures handled by the framework and only expose some kind of a handle to all the consumers. That would also mean having a clear split of the headers to distinguish between what's accessible to consumers vs providers. regards Rajendra > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pm_genpd_get); > + > +/** > + * pm_genpd_put - Put a generic I/O PM domain > + * @genpd: Pointer to a PM domain. > + */ > +void pm_genpd_put(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > +{ > + if (!genpd) > + return; > + > + genpd_lock(genpd); > + > + if (WARN_ON(!genpd->device_count || !genpd->suspended_count)) > + goto out; > + > + genpd->suspended_count--; > + genpd->device_count--; > + > +out: > + genpd_unlock(genpd); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pm_genpd_put); > + > +/** > + * pm_genpd_poweron - Power on a generic I/O PM domain > + * @genpd: Pointer to a PM domain. > + * > + * Powers on a PM domain, if not already on, and decrements the > + * 'suspended_count' to prevent the PM domain from being powered off. > + */ > +int pm_genpd_poweron(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > +{ > + if (!genpd) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + genpd_lock(genpd); > + > + if (WARN_ON(!genpd->suspended_count)) > + goto out; > + > + genpd->suspended_count--; > + genpd_sync_power_on(genpd, true, 0); > + > +out: > + genpd_unlock(genpd); > + > + return 0; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_genpd_poweron); > + > +/** > + * pm_genpd_poweroff - Power off a generic I/O PM domain > + * @genpd: Pointer to a PM domain. > + * > + * Increments the 'suspended_count' for a PM domain and if the > + * 'suspended_count' equals the 'device_count' then will power > + * off the PM domain. > + */ > +int pm_genpd_poweroff(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > +{ > + if (!genpd) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + genpd_lock(genpd); > + > + if (WARN_ON(genpd->suspended_count >= genpd->device_count)) > + goto out; > + > + genpd->suspended_count++; > + genpd_sync_power_off(genpd, false, 0); > + > +out: > + genpd_unlock(genpd); > + > + return 0; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_genpd_poweroff); > + > #ifdef CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_OF > > typedef struct generic_pm_domain *(*genpd_xlate_t)(struct of_phandle_args *args, > @@ -2171,7 +2285,6 @@ int of_genpd_parse_idle_states(struct device_node *dn, > return 0; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_genpd_parse_idle_states); > - > #endif /* CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_OF */ > > > @@ -2223,7 +2336,7 @@ static int pm_genpd_summary_one(struct seq_file *s, > const char *kobj_path; > struct gpd_link *link; > char state[16]; > - int ret; > + int ret, count; > > ret = genpd_lock_interruptible(genpd); > if (ret) > @@ -2250,6 +2363,8 @@ static int pm_genpd_summary_one(struct seq_file *s, > seq_puts(s, ", "); > } > > + count = genpd->device_count; > + > list_for_each_entry(pm_data, &genpd->dev_list, list_node) { > kobj_path = kobject_get_path(&pm_data->dev->kobj, > genpd_is_irq_safe(genpd) ? > @@ -2260,8 +2375,12 @@ static int pm_genpd_summary_one(struct seq_file *s, > seq_printf(s, "\n %-50s ", kobj_path); > rtpm_status_str(s, pm_data->dev); > kfree(kobj_path); > + count--; > } > > + if (count > 0) > + seq_printf(s, "\n unknown (%d)", count); > + > seq_puts(s, "\n"); > exit: > genpd_unlock(genpd); > diff --git a/include/linux/pm_domain.h b/include/linux/pm_domain.h > index 5339ed5bd6f9..b3aa1f237d96 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pm_domain.h > +++ b/include/linux/pm_domain.h > @@ -143,6 +143,10 @@ extern int pm_genpd_remove_subdomain(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, > extern int pm_genpd_init(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, > struct dev_power_governor *gov, bool is_off); > extern int pm_genpd_remove(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd); > +extern struct generic_pm_domain *pm_genpd_get(const char *name); > +extern void pm_genpd_put(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd); > +extern int pm_genpd_poweron(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd); > +extern int pm_genpd_poweroff(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd); > > extern struct dev_power_governor simple_qos_governor; > extern struct dev_power_governor pm_domain_always_on_gov; > @@ -182,6 +186,20 @@ static inline int pm_genpd_remove(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > { > return -ENOTSUPP; > } > +static inline struct generic_pm_domain *pm_genpd_get(const char *name) > +{ > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP); > +} > + > +static inline void pm_genpd_put(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) {} > +static inline int pm_genpd_poweron(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > +{ > + return -ENOTSUPP; > +} > +static inline int pm_genpd_poweroff(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > +{ > + return -ENOTSUPP; > +} > > #define simple_qos_governor (*(struct dev_power_governor *)(NULL)) > #define pm_domain_always_on_gov (*(struct dev_power_governor *)(NULL)) > -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation