Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 20:13:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 20:13:24 -0500 Received: from panic.ohr.gatech.edu ([130.207.47.194]:16908 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 20:13:10 -0500 Message-ID: <3A00BF7F.5C7CB1D7@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 20:12:31 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: MandrakeSoft X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.18pre18 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: "J . A . Magallon" , Linux Kernel List Subject: Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > J. A. Magallon wrote: > > I have noticed that in latest patch for 2.4.0, the global Makefile > > no more tries to find a kgcc, and falls back to gcc. The global Makefile in 2.4.x -never- looked for kgcc. > > I suppose because 2.7.2.3 is no more good for kernel, but still you > > can use 2.91, 2.95.2 or 2.96(??). Is that a patch that leaked in > > the way to test10, or is for another reason ?. > > I've not yet submitted it to Linus is the obvious reason 8) You're not changing 2.4.x to use kgcc, are you? It seems to be working fine under gcc 2.95.2+fixes... Jeff -- Jeff Garzik | "Mind if I drive?" -Sam Building 1024 | "Not if you don't mind me clawing at the MandrakeSoft | dash and shrieking like a cheerleader." | -Max - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/