Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264493AbTEaQaR (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 May 2003 12:30:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264496AbTEaQaR (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 May 2003 12:30:17 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:37390 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264493AbTEaQaQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 May 2003 12:30:16 -0400 To: rwhron@earthlink.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BENCHMARKS] 2.5.70 for 4 filesystems References: <20030531163339.GA9426@rushmore.suse.lists.linux.kernel> From: Andi Kleen Date: 31 May 2003 18:43:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20030531163339.GA9426@rushmore.suse.lists.linux.kernel> Message-ID: Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org rwhron@earthlink.net writes: > --------------- Sequential ---------- > ----- Create ----- ---- Delete ---- > /sec %CPU Eff /sec %CPU Eff > 2.5.70-reiserfs 7584 86.7 8751 2628 37.3 7038 > 2.5.70-xfs 1710 39.3 4347 2053 28.3 7247 > 2.5.70-ext2 150 99.0 151 60883 100.0 6088 > 2.5.70-ext3 119 95.0 126 26319 87.7 3002 It's quite surprising that reiserfs is so slow at deletion. In my normal experience reiserfs rm -rf is much faster than anything else (e.g. with a big rm -rf on an ext2 you have a chance to ctrl-c still, on reiserfs no such chance; XFS is really slow at this). Perhaps this is some 2.5 regression? Do you have 2.4 comparison numbers? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/