Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753424AbdDKTjz (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 15:39:55 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49725 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752648AbdDKTjx (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 15:39:53 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 21:39:48 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Kees Cook , Andrew Morton , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Linux-MM , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Add additional consistency check Message-ID: <20170411193948.GA29154@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20170411134618.GN6729@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170411141956.GP6729@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170411164134.GA21171@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170411183035.GD21171@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170411185555.GE21171@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 723 Lines: 23 On Tue 11-04-17 13:59:44, Cristopher Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > I didn't say anything like that. Hence the proposed patch which still > > needs some more thinking and evaluation. > > This patch does not even affect kfree(). Ehm? Are we even talking about the same thing? The whole discussion was to catch invalid pointers to _kfree_ and why BUG* is not the best way to handle that. > Could you start another > discussion thread where you discuss your suggestions for the changes in > the allocators and how we could go about this? I presume Kees will pursue http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170411141956.GP6729@dhcp22.suse.cz or something along those lines. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs