Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753479AbdDKUMH (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:12:07 -0400 Received: from mail-ua0-f172.google.com ([209.85.217.172]:34781 "EHLO mail-ua0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753122AbdDKUMD (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:12:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [108.49.102.27] In-Reply-To: References: <1491613030-11599-1-git-send-email-deepa.kernel@gmail.com> <1491613030-11599-7-git-send-email-deepa.kernel@gmail.com> From: Paul Moore Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:12:02 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] audit: Use timespec64 to represent audit timestamps To: Deepa Dinamani Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Alexander Viro , Greg KH , andreas.dilger@intel.com, Arnd Bergmann , "J. Bruce Fields" , Chris Mason , "David S. Miller" , David Sterba , Evgeniy Dushistov , Eric Paris , Jaegeuk Kim , Josef Bacik , Jeff Layton , John Stultz , James Simmons , Ingo Molnar , oleg.drokin@intel.com, Steven Rostedt , yuchao0@huawei.com, ceph-devel , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-btrfs , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, "Linux F2FS DEV, Mailing List" , Linux FS-devel Mailing List , linux-mtd , LSM List , lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org, Linux Network Devel Mailing List , samba-technical@lists.samba.org, y2038 Mailman List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 677 Lines: 18 On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Deepa Dinamani wrote: >> I have no problem merging this patch into audit/next for v4.12, would >> you prefer me to do that so at least this patch is merged? > > This would be fine. > But, I think whoever takes the last 2 deletion patches should also take them. > I'm not sure how that part works out. FWIW, I just merged this into the audit/next branch so at least this will go into v4.12. >> It would probably make life a small bit easier for us in the audit >> world too as it would reduce the potential merge conflict. However, >> that's a relatively small thing to worry about. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com