Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753826AbdDLKp6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2017 06:45:58 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f174.google.com ([209.85.128.174]:34519 "EHLO mail-wr0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753285AbdDLKpz (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2017 06:45:55 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:45:51 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com Cc: gnurou@gmail.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, edubezval@gmail.com, dvhart@infradead.org, rui.zhang@intel.com, andy@infradead.org, hdegoede@redhat.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, sathyaosid@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/7] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: fix TMU interrupt index Message-ID: <20170412104551.g2xkpihz2n2hju4m@dell> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-08-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2021 Lines: 63 On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan > > TMU interrupts are registered as a separate interrupt chip, and > hence it should start its interrupt index(BXTWC_TMU_IRQ) number > from 0. But currently, BXTWC_TMU_IRQ is defined as part of enum > bxtwc_irqs_level2 and its index value is 11. Since this index > value is used when calculating .num_irqs of regmap_irq_chip_tmu, > it incorrectly reports number of irqs as 12 instead of actual > value of 1. > > static const struct regmap_irq bxtwc_regmap_irqs_tmu[] = { > REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_TMU_IRQ, 0, 0x06), > }; > > static struct regmap_irq_chip bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_tmu = { > .name = "bxtwc_irq_chip_tmu", > .status_base = BXTWC_TMUIRQ, > .mask_base = BXTWC_MTMUIRQ, > .irqs = bxtwc_regmap_irqs_tmu, > .num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(bxtwc_regmap_irqs_tmu), > .num_regs = 1, > }; > > This patch fixes this issue by creating new enum of tmu irqs and > resetting its starting index to 0. > > Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan > --- > drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Patch looks fine, but please remove the code segment from the commit log. For the code: For my own reference: Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c > index 699c8c7..bb18e20 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c > @@ -94,7 +94,10 @@ enum bxtwc_irqs_level2 { > BXTWC_GPIO0_IRQ, > BXTWC_GPIO1_IRQ, > BXTWC_CRIT_IRQ, > - BXTWC_TMU_IRQ, > +}; > + > +enum bxtwc_irqs_tmu { > + BXTWC_TMU_IRQ = 0, > }; > > static const struct regmap_irq bxtwc_regmap_irqs[] = { -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog