Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754793AbdDLQhe (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:37:34 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:48054 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752721AbdDLQhc (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:37:32 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 9BB7D6047C Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=sboyd@codeaurora.org Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:37:30 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd To: Neil Armstrong Cc: Linus Walleij , Eric Anholt , linux-clk , Mike Turquette , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" , Russell King Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] drm/pl111: Initial drm/kms driver for pl111 Message-ID: <20170412163730.GM7065@codeaurora.org> References: <20170411011801.15788-1-eric@anholt.net> <87lgr6ego2.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> <3cba2a40-64fa-b73d-cc21-ebc27f4051bf@baylibre.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3cba2a40-64fa-b73d-cc21-ebc27f4051bf@baylibre.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3351 Lines: 85 On 04/12, Neil Armstrong wrote: > On 04/12/2017 09:40 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Eric Anholt wrote: > > > >> Oh, one last thing I think we need to figure out: I'm using TIM2_CLKSEL, > >> which seems to be necessary on this platform. My understanding is that > >> this means that the pixel clock is divided from clcdclk instead of > >> apb_pclk. Do you agree? > > > > Yes the pixed clock is always derived from clcdclk. > > > > In most older ARM reference designs this is a VCO so that > > is why there is a clk_set_rate() on this in the fbdev code. > > (On some platforms that even has no effect I guess.) > > > >> The fbdev driver is using > >> clk_get(&fb->dev->dev, NULL) and not TIM2_CLKSEL, which I'm surprised by > >> because I would have thought that would give us the first clock from the > >> DT node (also clcdclk). > > > > So that thing is a 1-bit line that can select one of two clocks > > to be muxed into the PL111/CLCD. > > > > I guess that up until now all platforms just left that line dangling in > > the silicon. Congratulations, you came here first ;) > > > > Though when I look at the Nomadik it seems that it might be muxing > > the clock between 48 and 72 MHz, and I've been using 48MHz > > all along ooopsie. > > > > The current assumption in the bindings is that we have only > > one clock and TIM2_CLKSEL is N/A. > > > > If we want proper clcdclk handling with CLKSEL you should > > probably add some code to implement a real mux clock for > > this using and drivers/clk/clk-mux.c > > with select COMMON_CLK > > so that the driver still only sees clcdclk but that in turn is a > > mux that can select one of two sources and will react to > > the clk_set_rate() call by selecting the clock which is > > closest in frequency to what you want. > > > > This needs a small patch to alter the bindings too I guess. > > A small clock node inside the CLCD, just like PCI bridges have > > irqchips inside them etc: > > > > clcd@10120000 { > > compatible = "arm,pl110", "arm,primecell"; > > reg = <0x10120000 0x1000>; > > (...) > > clocks = <&clcdclk>, <&foo>; > > clock-names = "clcdclk", "apb_pclk"; > > > > clcdclk: clock-controller@0 { > > compatible = "arm,pl11x-clock-mux"; > > clocks = <&source_a>, <&source_b>; > > }; > > }; > > > > This can be set up easily in the OF probe path since that > > is what we're doing: just look for this subnode, if it is there > > create the clock controller. > > > > I do not think the clk maintainers would mind a small mux > > clock controller inside the CLCD driver to handle this mux > > if we need it. > > Hi Linus, > > Indeed it's the way of handling this use case, but no need to add > a clk node here, you can copy what we did in pwm-meson, meson-gx-mmc.c, > or dwmac-meson8b.c (we went further by also adding clk dividers). > > In the probe code, simply add a clock mux provider with the two parents > clock names (these can and should be platform specific) and only call > a clk_set_parent() with the clock specified in the node clocks cell. > +1 Avoiding a binding update is nice. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project