Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264678AbTFARbO (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2003 13:31:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264679AbTFARbO (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2003 13:31:14 -0400 Received: from scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.49]:48867 "EHLO scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264678AbTFARbN (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2003 13:31:13 -0400 Subject: Re: Strange load issues with 2.5.69/70 in both -mm and -bk trees. From: Tom Sightler To: Mike Galbraith Cc: LKML In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20030601084615.00ce6e30@pop.gmx.net> References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030601084615.00ce6e30@pop.gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1054489407.1722.50.camel@iso-8590-lx.zeusinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 01 Jun 2003 13:43:27 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.3, required 10, AWL, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION, IN_REP_TO, REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 848 Lines: 28 On Sun, 2003-06-01 at 02:54, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > Hi, > > Wine is the shockwave plugin server right? You reniced _wine_ and the > problem went away? > > -Mike > Yes, this is correct. It's showed as pluginserver in the 'ps ax' output but I've since noticed that it is simply a symlink to wine. Of the two wine processes, wine and wineserver, it was the wine frontend process that was getting all of the CPU, showing 100% utilization. Renicing the wine process made the problem go away. Running the exact same config on a 2.4.20 kernel uses only a few % of the CPU. Later, Tom - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/