Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755717AbdDLWsS (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:48:18 -0400 Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]:55437 "EHLO kirsty.vergenet.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752851AbdDLWsO (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:48:14 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:48:08 +0900 From: Simon Horman To: Aaron Conole Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wensong Zhang , Julian Anastasov , Pablo Neira Ayuso , Jozsef Kadlecsik Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next] ip_vs_sync: change comparison on sync_refresh_period Message-ID: <20170412224808.GB7620@verge.net.au> References: <20170412203812.15091-1-aconole@bytheb.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170412203812.15091-1-aconole@bytheb.org> Organisation: Horms Solutions BV User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 275 Lines: 8 On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 04:38:12PM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote: > The sync_refresh_period variable is unsigned, so it can never be < 0. > > Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole Thanks Aaron, I have applied this to ipvs-next after updating the prefix to "ipvs:".