Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264694AbTFASIz (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2003 14:08:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264695AbTFASIz (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2003 14:08:55 -0400 Received: from Mail1.kontent.de ([81.88.34.36]:33987 "EHLO Mail1.KONTENT.De") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264694AbTFASIg (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2003 14:08:36 -0400 From: Oliver Neukum To: Alexander Hoogerhuis Subject: Re: USB 2.0 with 250Gb disk and insane loads Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 20:21:40 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 Cc: David Brownell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <3EDA0E5D.8080404@pacbell.net> <200306011653.47958.oliver@neukum.org> <87k7c5g738.fsf@lapper.ihatent.com> In-Reply-To: <87k7c5g738.fsf@lapper.ihatent.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200306012021.41147.oliver@neukum.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1527 Lines: 40 > > Probably the block layer as it waits for free io slots. > > But that doesn't tell us why the requests are not executed. > > Where is SCSI timeout kicking in? > > I'm not seeing any scsi timeouts in the logs. So it seems that the driver doesn't fail utterly, but crawls along. Storage's debugging output should clarify the situation. [..] > > Could you try on USB1.1 only? > > Stuck it in an older machine on USB 1.1 and it foudn the disk fine > (redhat 9, 2.4.20-13.9 kernel on that machine), and ditto result: > > 19:15:16 up 2 days, 20:23, 4 users, load average: 6.02, 2.41, 0.89 > 58 processes: 55 sleeping, 3 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped > CPU states: 0.2% user 4.0% system 0.0% nice 0.0% iowait 95.8% idle > Mem: 385040k av, 380820k used, 4220k free, 0k shrd, 67368k > buff 224720k active, 69412k inactive > Swap: 521632k av, 80k used, 521552k free 237452k > cached > > and generating about 2500 interrupts for the usb controller per 10 > seconds and when i finally break it off and give it "sync" it uses > about two minutes with about 4500 per 10 seconds to get it all on > disk. On 2.4 the machine becomes more and more sluggish if I let it go > more than a short minute. Which 2.4 ? Regards Oliver - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/