Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755322AbdDMSiJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Apr 2017 14:38:09 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:49878 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752273AbdDMSiH (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Apr 2017 14:38:07 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 20:37:56 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Samuel Thibault , Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Re: Costless huge virtual memory? /dev/same, /dev/null? Message-ID: <20170413183756.GA17630@kroah.com> References: <20160229162835.GA2816@var.bordeaux.inria.fr> <20170413094200.b4lftvumqt4g36hz@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170413094200.b4lftvumqt4g36hz@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.1 (2017-04-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 296 Lines: 9 On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:42:00AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > More than one year passed without any activity :) > > I have attached a proposed patch for discussion. As a rule, I don't apply RFC patches, as obviously the submitter doesn't think it is worthy of being applied :)