Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 13:10:37 +0200
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SCO's claims seem empty
Message-ID: <20030602111037.GA32253@pusa.informat.uv.es>
References: <1054512915.1620.2.camel@localhost> <200306020119.h521Jbdv003050@eeyore.valparaiso.cl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <200306020119.h521Jbdv003050@eeyore.valparaiso.cl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: uaca@alumni.uv.es
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 842
Lines: 24

Hello everybody


let me speculate what we will see when SCO shows their "assumed proofs"

they will show code of the kernel and they will claim that was previously on
SCO's operating system (and was made by them without a GPL license), 

how to refute that?

	Ulisses

                Debian GNU/Linux: a dream come true
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Computers are useless. They can only give answers."            Pablo Picasso

--->	Visita http://www.valux.org/ para saber acerca de la	<---
--->	Asociaci?n Valenciana de Usuarios de Linux		<---
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/