Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754188AbdDQSsK (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2017 14:48:10 -0400 Received: from ec2-52-27-115-49.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com ([52.27.115.49]:51503 "EHLO osg.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751528AbdDQSsH (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2017 14:48:07 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/18] 4.4.62-stable review To: "kernelci.org bot" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20170416080212.713469777@linuxfoundation.org> <58f36a37.cc9bdf0a.86c97.bb8a@mx.google.com> Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org, shuah Khan From: Shuah Khan Message-ID: Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:48:04 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <58f36a37.cc9bdf0a.86c97.bb8a@mx.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1195 Lines: 30 On 04/16/2017 06:57 AM, kernelci.org bot wrote: > stable-rc/linux-4.4.y boot: 87 boots: 2 failed, 82 passed with 3 offline (v4.4.61-19-ge153e9e2397b) > > Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.4.y/kernel/v4.4.61-19-ge153e9e2397b/ > Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.4.y/kernel/v4.4.61-19-ge153e9e2397b/ > > Tree: stable-rc > Branch: linux-4.4.y > Git Describe: v4.4.61-19-ge153e9e2397b > Git Commit: e153e9e2397bd8b93af00fdf9a417568b342e271 > Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > Tested: 12 unique boards, 6 SoC families, 22 builds out of 201 > > Boot Regressions Detected: > > arm: > > multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n: > exynos5250-snow: > lab-collabora: failing since 92 days (last pass: v4.4.40-59-g1d41ca34dce6 - first fail: v4.4.42-28-g707ffd8554f6) My understanding is that CONFIG_SMP=n is blacklisted for exynos. Are you testing this config now? I will follow up to see if !SMP use-case is important one to fix it. That said, I am not sure if this is a regression in the sense that, if !SMP ever worked on exynos. thanks, -- Shuah