Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:14:56 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
        Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
        Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Yasuaki Ishimatsu <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>, qiuxishi@huawei.com,
        Kani Toshimitsu <toshi.kani@hpe.com>, slaoub@gmail.com,
        Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>,
        Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
        Tobias Regnery <tobias.regnery@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 0/9] mm: make movable onlining suck less
Message-ID: <20170418071456.GD22360@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <20170410110351.12215-1-mhocko@kernel.org>
 <20170411170317.GB21171@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <CAA9_cmdrNZkOByvSecmocqs=6o8ZP5bz+Zx6NrwqjU66C=5Y4w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAA9_cmdrNZkOByvSecmocqs=6o8ZP5bz+Zx6NrwqjU66C=5Y4w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 885
Lines: 22

On Mon 17-04-17 14:51:12, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
> > All the reported issue seem to be fixed and pushed to my git tree
> > attempts/rewrite-mem_hotplug branch. I will wait a day or two for more
> > feedback and then repost for the inclusion. I would really appreaciate
> > more testing/review!
> 
> This still seems to be based on 4.10? It's missing some block-layer
> fixes and other things that trigger failures in the nvdimm unit tests.
> Can you rebase to a more recent 4.11-rc?

OK, I will rebase on top of linux-next. This has been based on mmotm
tree so far. Btw. is there anything that would change the current
implementation other than small context tweaks? In other words, do you
see any issues with the current implementation regarding nvdimm's
ZONE_DEVICE usage?

Thanks!

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs