Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264893AbTFCCHZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:07:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264894AbTFCCHZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:07:25 -0400 Received: from exchange-1.umflint.edu ([141.216.3.48]:29097 "EHLO Exchange-1.umflint.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264893AbTFCCHX convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:07:23 -0400 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: RE: SCO's claims seem empty Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:18:01 -0400 Message-ID: <37885B2630DF0C4CA95EFB47B30985FB0187FFE7@exchange-1.umflint.edu> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: SCO's claims seem empty Thread-Index: AcMpagTMa405m8G6TRiwBRqUsAroVwAC3pow From: "Lauro, John" To: "Raimundo Bilbao" , Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2422 Lines: 75 >From what I read when SCO had more on their web site, it's more a question of contract violation. IBM had a contract for their Unix, and developed their code for that. Then IBM ported some of their "own" kernel mods that was written for AIX and released it into Linux for free. That violated some portion of the Unix contract. Thus, if IBM wins, could have implications against some parts of GPL, and maybe that is why Microsoft is backing SCO. I may be way off base, but SCO always stated it was contract issues and not code or copyright. > -----Original Message----- > From: Raimundo Bilbao [mailto:rbilbao@inzignia.cl] > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 8:43 PM > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: SCO's claims seem empty > > El Dom 01 Jun 2003 21:19, Horst von Brand escribi?: > > Paul Rolland said: > > > > [...] > > > > > However ..somebody must have realised, that this was nonsense and > > > removed it from the site. > > > > Perhaps due to the court decision in Germany, restraining them from > > claiming that Linux uses Unix code illegaly until the court sees into > the > > matter... > > What's up doc, nice to see you here ! :-D > > Honestly, I don't know what to think right now, perhaps all that SCO's > stuff > was a mere smoke-bomb (you kown, that's M$ bombs what we seen back in the > 90's :-D agaisnt IBM ?, remember OS/2 --> xxxNT ?) > > A chimp's IQ level CIO of any company don't start to sue everyone in the > planet if he have a little of common sense about they possibilities to > win > (or else they must to be prepared for the linux's strike back :-} ), and > for > this particular case they are, to say, very very wired (AFAIK they haven't > provide a concise probe of that _stolen-critical-olimpicus-code_ that > nobody > else on this planet can write, except off course, SCO and their > ilumminated > community of gurues :-D ). > > > cheers > mundo > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/