Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264906AbTFCC7u (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:59:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264905AbTFCC7u (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:59:50 -0400 Received: from cerafin.nivel5.cl ([200.73.9.74]:21420 "EHLO mail.inzignia.cl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264906AbTFCC7t convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:59:49 -0400 From: Raimundo Bilbao Organization: Inzignia S.A. To: "Lauro, John" , Subject: Re: SCO's claims seem empty Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 23:02:21 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <37885B2630DF0C4CA95EFB47B30985FB0187FFE7@exchange-1.umflint.edu> In-Reply-To: <37885B2630DF0C4CA95EFB47B30985FB0187FFE7@exchange-1.umflint.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200306022302.21976.rbilbao@inzignia.cl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1899 Lines: 41 El Lun 02 Jun 2003 22:18, Lauro, John escribi?: > From what I read when SCO had more on their web site, it's more a > question of contract violation. IBM had a contract for their Unix, and > developed their code for that. Then IBM ported some of their "own" > kernel mods that was written for AIX and released it into Linux for > free. That violated some portion of the Unix contract. Thus, if IBM > wins, could have implications against some parts of GPL, and maybe > that is why Microsoft is backing SCO. > > I may be way off base, but SCO always stated it was contract issues > and not code or copyright. [...] Ok, but all this noise (AFAIK) was started from a sue against IBM not Linux, however (pretty) soon was focused on some _mitical_ portions of the linux kernel (I really want to read those ET codes, maybe I can learn alot from those aliens's gurues ;-D) and then toward GNU licenses and some others wired implications. I really think SCO haven't a real case against Linux (maybe toward IBM, but not linux), however everybody knows what a _special_ group of lawyers can do, no? ;-) Another think what ringing on mi (little) brain is the simple question : somebody remember the surprise off know, sometime ago, that NT was include zlib's code into this?, now I asking myself, what else they have _included_?, the SCO sue has some implications against them?. Maybe I never know, but it's an intersting question, maybe SCO (or anybody else) ending with a sue to every operating system on this planet from now toward if they want (a really nasty scenario). OK, enough of this, let's R&R and back to work... ;-D cheers mundo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/