Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264918AbTFCDeZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2003 23:34:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264919AbTFCDeZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2003 23:34:25 -0400 Received: from modemcable204.207-203-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca ([24.203.207.204]:20610 "EHLO montezuma.mastecende.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264918AbTFCDeY (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2003 23:34:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 23:36:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Zwane Mwaikambo X-X-Sender: zwane@montezuma.mastecende.com To: Con Kolivas cc: linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 100Hz v 1000Hz with contest In-Reply-To: <200306031322.01389.kernel@kolivas.org> Message-ID: References: <200306031322.01389.kernel@kolivas.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1610 Lines: 40 On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Con Kolivas wrote: > I've attempted to answer the question does 1000Hz hurt responsiveness in 2.5 > as much as I've found in 2.4; since subjectively the difference wasn't there > in 2.5. Using the same config with preempt enabled here are results from > 2.5.70-mm3 set at default 1000Hz and at 100Hz (mm31): Thanks for carrying out these =) > ctar_load: > Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio > 2.5.70-mm3 3 114 70.2 1.0 5.3 1.44 > 2.5.70-mm31 3 105 73.3 0.7 3.8 1.36 > dbench_load: > Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio > 2.5.70-mm3 4 313 24.3 5.0 56.9 3.96 > 2.5.70-mm31 4 297 24.9 4.5 52.5 3.86 > > At first glance everything looks faster at 100Hz. However it is well known > that it will take slightly longer even with no load at 1000Hz. Taking that > into consideration and looking more at the final ratios than the absolute > numbers it is apparent that the difference is statistically insignificant, > except on ctar_load. What about dbench_load? > Previously I had benchmark results on 1000Hz which showed preempt improved the > results in a few of the loads. For my next experiment I will compare 100Hz > with preempt to 100Hz without. Cheers, Zwane -- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/