Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263865AbTFCHrR (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jun 2003 03:47:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264221AbTFCHrQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jun 2003 03:47:16 -0400 Received: from denise.shiny.it ([194.20.232.1]:29824 "EHLO denise.shiny.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263865AbTFCHrQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jun 2003 03:47:16 -0400 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.7 on Linux X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200306031322.01389.kernel@kolivas.org> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 10:00:38 +0200 (CEST) From: Giuliano Pochini To: Con Kolivas Subject: RE: [BENCHMARK] 100Hz v 1000Hz with contest Cc: linux kernel mailing list Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 644 Lines: 17 On 03-Jun-2003 Con Kolivas wrote: > I've attempted to answer the question does 1000Hz hurt responsiveness in 2.5 > as much as I've found in 2.4; since subjectively the difference wasn't there > in 2.5. Using the same config with preempt enabled here are results from > 2.5.70-mm3 set at default 1000Hz and at 100Hz (mm31): Is there any problem using a frequency other than 100 and 1000Hz ? Bye. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/