Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965122AbdDSPLw (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:11:52 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f53.google.com ([209.85.214.53]:36497 "EHLO mail-it0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936246AbdDSPLs (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:11:48 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:11:45 -0600 From: Jens Axboe To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: ooo@electrozaur.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, trond.myklebust@primarydata.com, osd-dev@open-osd.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: drop the T10 OSD code and its users Message-ID: <20170419151144.GA22579@kernel.dk> References: <20170412160109.10598-1-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170412160109.10598-1-hch@lst.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 606 Lines: 15 On Wed, Apr 12 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The only real user of the T10 OSD protocol, the pNFS object layout > driver never went to the point of having shipping products, and the > other two users (osdblk and exofs) were simple example of it's usage. > > The code has been mostly unmaintained for years and is getting in the > way of block / SCSI changes, so I think it's finally time to drop it. > > These patches are against Jens' block for-next tree as that already I've added 1/4 for now, as that one should obviously go. If we have consensus to kill the rest, I'm all for it. -- Jens Axboe