Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965338AbdDSPRl (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:17:41 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:52758 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965296AbdDSPRh (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:17:37 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 08:17:24 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Josh Triplett , Christian Borntraeger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 0/13] Miscellaneous fixes for 4.12 Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20170412165441.GA17149@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170417232714.GA19013@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170419112845.3rt3zlyzuzert647@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20170419120847.GB3029@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20170419144730.GA20845@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170419145844.GA17080@cloud> <20170419150309.jf5zfuz4jgmkygng@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170419150309.jf5zfuz4jgmkygng@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 17041915-0056-0000-0000-0000034380E8 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00006939; HX=3.00000240; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000208; SDB=6.00849649; UDB=6.00419563; IPR=6.00628282; BA=6.00005304; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00015095; XFM=3.00000013; UTC=2017-04-19 15:17:30 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 17041915-0057-0000-0000-0000077992C4 Message-Id: <20170419151724.GO3956@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-04-19_13:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1704190128 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 550 Lines: 14 On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 05:03:09PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 07:58:44AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > > Still something to hesitate a bit before using, but not something > > checkpatch should warn about. > > How else will you get people to hesitate? The fact that checkpatch has been warning about it for quite some time should suffice for the near future. Longer term, there is no more reason to complain about synchronize_rcu_expedited() than there is to complain about smp_call_function(). Thanx, Paul