Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966557AbdDSQoo (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:44:44 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:54134 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966465AbdDSQol (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:44:41 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 5660360DB1 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=sboyd@codeaurora.org Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:44:39 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd To: Stefan Agner Cc: shawnguo@kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, aisheng.dong@nxp.com, fabio.estevam@nxp.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: imx7d: fix USDHC NAND clock Message-ID: <20170419164439.GG7065@codeaurora.org> References: <20170410210015.1620-1-stefan@agner.ch> <20170419161435.GA7065@codeaurora.org> <9f0b9e83bc2a46bacb323d3ff2cfcf64@agner.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9f0b9e83bc2a46bacb323d3ff2cfcf64@agner.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 911 Lines: 26 On 04/19, Stefan Agner wrote: > On 2017-04-19 09:14, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 04/10, Stefan Agner wrote: > >> The USDHC NAND root clock is not gated by any CCM clock gate. Remove > >> the bogus gate definition. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner > >> --- > > > > Can this be applied? It's followed by a dtsi change and there is > > zero information about if the two depend on each other. Please > > add cover letters for these sorts of things in the future > > indicating how you expect merging to work. > > This can be merged. The two changes are independent. > > They look kind of dependent, but really aren't since > IMX7D_NAND_USDHC_BUS_ROOT_CLK is still in the init_on list. Should have > explicitly mentioned that, sorry about that. > Thanks. Applied to clk-next. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project