Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S941382AbdDTFTh (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2017 01:19:37 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:38792 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936526AbdDTFTf (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2017 01:19:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 07:19:33 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Jens Axboe , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Kai-Heng Feng , linux-nvme , Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg , Keith Busch Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] nvme APST fixes/improvements for 4.11 Message-ID: <20170420051933.GA10985@lst.de> References: <20170420030959.GC23085@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 552 Lines: 11 On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 09:52:17PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > I can make it so that force_apst=0 means no APST and force_apst=1 mean > > yes APST and we could try again with a quirk list for 4.12. There's a > > decent chance that a few more weeks with Ubuntu having APST on will > > shake out all the problems fairly quickly. > > Here's a more concrete and more sensible proposal: Can we just have force_apst=on to force it on, force_apst=off to turn it off, and leave it with that? And yes, I mean the strings instead of the weird numbers.