Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1033169AbdDTQPd (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2017 12:15:33 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f193.google.com ([209.85.128.193]:36201 "EHLO mail-wr0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1033079AbdDTQP3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2017 12:15:29 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] nvme APST quirk updates, take two To: Jens Axboe , Andy Lutomirski References: <9cd43193-af6b-2cb1-3951-5fa569bf1f31@kernel.dk> Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Kai-Heng Feng , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig , Keith Busch From: Sagi Grimberg Message-ID: Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 19:15:15 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9cd43193-af6b-2cb1-3951-5fa569bf1f31@kernel.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 573 Lines: 16 >> Hi Jens- >> >> These are just the quirk updates, split out. The patches are >> unchanged. >> >> I think that, even if we want to apply a broader quirk for 4.11, we >> should still apply these so that we can cleanly revert the broader >> quirk later. IOW, let's get the known regressions fixed before we >> get too excited about the unknown regressions. > > This looks good to me, and 4.11 appropriate. I'll expedite this > through the block tree, if Keith/Sagi/Christoph agrees on this > being the right approach for 4.11. I'm perfectly fine with this going to 4.11