Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1031689AbdDTS4f (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:56:35 -0400
Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:29391 "EHLO mga06.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S965125AbdDTS4e (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:56:34 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,225,1488873600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="79289681"
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 11:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Shivappa Vikas <vikas.shivappa@intel.com>
X-X-Sender: vikas@vshiva-Udesk
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
cc: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>,
        vikas.shivappa@intel.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@kernel.org,
        "Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>, tony.luck@intel.com,
        "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/intel_rdt: Return error for incorrect resource
 names in schemata
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1704201541230.2059@nanos>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1704201139240.3411@vshiva-Udesk>
References: <1492645804-17465-1-git-send-email-vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com> <1492645804-17465-4-git-send-email-vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1704201541230.2059@nanos>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1830
Lines: 75



On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> On Wed, 19 Apr 2017, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
>
>>  		}
>
> The resulting loop is just horrible to read. We can do better than
> that. Patch below.
>
> Thanks,
>
> 	tglx
> 8<-------------
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_schemata.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_schemata.c
> @@ -187,6 +187,17 @@ static int update_domains(struct rdt_res
> 	return 0;
> }
>
> +static int rdtgroup_parse_resource(char *resname, char *tok, int closid)
> +{
> +	struct rdt_resource *r;
> +
> +	for_each_enabled_rdt_resource(r) {
> +		if (!strcmp(resname, r->name) && closid < r->num_closid)
> +			return parse_line(tok, r);
> +	}
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> ssize_t rdtgroup_schemata_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
> 				char *buf, size_t nbytes, loff_t off)
> {
> @@ -209,9 +220,10 @@ ssize_t rdtgroup_schemata_write(struct k
>
> 	closid = rdtgrp->closid;
>
> -	for_each_enabled_rdt_resource(r)
> +	for_each_enabled_rdt_resource(r) {
> 		list_for_each_entry(dom, &r->domains, list)
> 			dom->have_new_ctrl = false;
> +	}
>
> 	while ((tok = strsep(&buf, "\n")) != NULL) {
> 		resname = strsep(&tok, ":");
> @@ -219,19 +231,9 @@ ssize_t rdtgroup_schemata_write(struct k
> 			ret = -EINVAL;
> 			goto out;
> 		}
> -		for_each_enabled_rdt_resource(r) {
> -			if (!strcmp(strim(resname), r->name) &&
> -			    closid < r->num_closid) {
> -				ret = parse_line(tok, r);
> -				if (ret)
> -					goto out;
> -				break;
> -			}
> -		}
> -		if (!r->name) {
> -			ret = -EINVAL;
> +		ret = rdtgroup_parse_resource(strim(resname), tok, closid);
> +		if (ret)
> 			goto out;
> -		}
> 	}

Ok agree its better way. I was trying to add a NULL which Tony already said was 
Nacked, did not really want to use a pointer which may be out of bounds 
although we dont check the contents.

Thanks,
Vikas